Reason #20: The Maqaam of Dai al-Asr – (Part Two)
The website and the material presented under the instructions of the Muda’ee Khuzaima repeatedly purport that al-Dai al-Ajal Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA was, Na’uwzobillah, incapacitated during the final years of his life. That he believes, or expresses, that Moula RA was ‘unaware’ of his surroundings, not only during the specific instances of nass but with regards to the general functioning of Dawat, is doubt and disbelief in the very maqaam of al-Dai al-Mutlaq, as has been mentioned in the post below.
In the audio clip posted on FateliDawat.com that is cited as an example of Khuzaima’s unparalleled understanding and ma’rifah of the Dai al-Asr, he eulogizes Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA with a bayt mubarak of al-Dai al-Ajal Syedna Taher Saifuddin’s RA composed in the description of al-Dai al-Ajal Syedna Noor Mohammed Nooruddin RA. He says that Moulana RA is The Light of Allah Ta’ala who has merely taken the form of a human being. On one hand, he claims Moulana Burhanuddin RA is a divine radiant being who has chosen to take human form, and on the other he now states that this same Moula RA, like any other common human being, is imprisoned by the shackles of his physical form and ailments, powerless to stop the alleged ‘exploitation’, ‘hijacking’ and ‘falsehood’ being carried out due to his illness. This is a blatant attack on the maqaam of the Dai and is an assault on his capacity to take care of Imam’s Dawat.
There are numerous examples in the history of Hudat Kiram RA that highlight the fact that they have often accepted conditions of vulnerability and debility for various reasons and hikmat. Imam Ali Zain al-Abedeen SA allowed himself to be bound by shackles and fetters, yet demonstrated that if he wished, he could release himself from his imprisonment.
What is important to understand is that no matter the physical limitations the Imam or Dai accepts upon himself, at no point is the Dawat in jeopardy or are any of its essential functionalities compromised. That Khuzaima would suggest that not only Moula’s RA jism mubarak, but his Dawat was hijacked is an insult to Moulana Burhanuddin RA and an outright denial that there is hikmat in Moulana’s RA physical condition. During his final hours, Rasulullah’s SA physical jism mubarak was weak and frail. Yet despite this condition and severe illness, upon hearing someone leading namaaz in his mehraab, with the assistance of Amirul Mumineen SA, he headed to the masjid and pulled that individual out from the qiblah. Rasulullah SA would not allow that man to lead a single namaaz; how could Khuzaima accuse Rasulullah’s SA Dai RA of allowing others of exploiting his Dawat and appointing someone as his successor without his raza and blessings?
53 Reasons NOT To Believe Khuzaima Qutbuddin 
After reading this reason which clearly highlights khuzaima’s disregard for the elite divine position of dai mutlaq, I cannot help but recount a personal experience. I was in msb khidmat during 99 milad mubarak tabudaat days when khuzaima unfortunately visited secunderabad. from jamaat messages encouraging people to stand on roads for deedar to going in baggi for ziyafat in colony vicinity, everything seemed inappropriate.
In one ziyafat where we luckily got izan, his son aziz did shukr araz as per his habit. Very noticeably completely undermining the maqam of Burhanuddin Mola RA he says “mola aa bhai jivare chennai si yaha aaya to ehna paase kai notu, AAPNI DUA NA SIVA biju kai lai ne nohta aaya ane aaje malamaal che”.
Which mansoos in history of dawat in hayat of his naas did ever think of crediting himself for mumeneen’s temporal and spiritual progress let alone explicitly uttering it!
We being khidmatguzar of mola, nurtured in dua mubarak of mola felt an emotional choke but obviously neither could do or express anything except sitting arm tied.
Let us distinguish between our 53 Spiritual Dai from just being a figurehead but one who was chosen to lead the bohra community to even higher planes that Seyedna Taherseifuddin had envisioned for his community.
Dear Sir,
First of all, you are not “Hashim Ghadiali” as we have received an email from him saying that YOU (whoever you are) are misusing his name. Such are the tactics of your kind. Taking the place of someone they aren’t, and don’t deserve to be.
A caption of your earlier post was:
“Let us distinguish between our 53 Spiritual Dai from just being a figurehead but one who was chosen to lead the bohra community to even higher planes that Seyedna Taherseifuddin had envisioned for his community.”
I couldn’t agree with you more. Let us distinguish between one who was a figure head, in a rutba, and one whom the 52nd Dai performed Nass on 5 occasions, amongst witnesses and with documented evidence.
@ Mr. Imposter,
So you too talk like your HEAD “Imposter”. I would like to advice you three things.
1. Please at-least learn how Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA, used to spell his name. (Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA).
I surely believe you don’t even count him as Saif of Imaam uz zaman.
2. You mean to say (Nauzobillah) Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA didn’t lead us (“Bohra Community” as you prefer to say) to the “higher planes” that Syedna Taher “Saifuddin” RA envisioned?
We believe our beloved maula Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA exactly lived to the expectations to his BELOVED father and Shams al Duat al Mutlakin Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA.
3. And I can’t stress it more, there is no doubt about whom Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA and Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA chose to be the 53rd Dai al Mutlaq.
Now too if some one has closed his eyes to the lies of the taghoot, then there is only one answer left for them. lakum deeno kum, wa le yadeen.
Abde Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS,
Mustafa M. Shabbirbhai