Reason #20: The Maqaam of Dai al-Asr – (Part Two)
The website and the material presented under the instructions of the Muda’ee Khuzaima repeatedly purport that al-Dai al-Ajal Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA was, Na’uwzobillah, incapacitated during the final years of his life. That he believes, or expresses, that Moula RA was ‘unaware’ of his surroundings, not only during the specific instances of nass but with regards to the general functioning of Dawat, is doubt and disbelief in the very maqaam of al-Dai al-Mutlaq, as has been mentioned in the post below.
In the audio clip posted on FateliDawat.com that is cited as an example of Khuzaima’s unparalleled understanding and ma’rifah of the Dai al-Asr, he eulogizes Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA with a bayt mubarak of al-Dai al-Ajal Syedna Taher Saifuddin’s RA composed in the description of al-Dai al-Ajal Syedna Noor Mohammed Nooruddin RA. He says that Moulana RA is The Light of Allah Ta’ala who has merely taken the form of a human being. On one hand, he claims Moulana Burhanuddin RA is a divine radiant being who has chosen to take human form, and on the other he now states that this same Moula RA, like any other common human being, is imprisoned by the shackles of his physical form and ailments, powerless to stop the alleged ‘exploitation’, ‘hijacking’ and ‘falsehood’ being carried out due to his illness. This is a blatant attack on the maqaam of the Dai and is an assault on his capacity to take care of Imam’s Dawat.
There are numerous examples in the history of Hudat Kiram RA that highlight the fact that they have often accepted conditions of vulnerability and debility for various reasons and hikmat. Imam Ali Zain al-Abedeen SA allowed himself to be bound by shackles and fetters, yet demonstrated that if he wished, he could release himself from his imprisonment.
What is important to understand is that no matter the physical limitations the Imam or Dai accepts upon himself, at no point is the Dawat in jeopardy or are any of its essential functionalities compromised. That Khuzaima would suggest that not only Moula’s RA jism mubarak, but his Dawat was hijacked is an insult to Moulana Burhanuddin RA and an outright denial that there is hikmat in Moulana’s RA physical condition. During his final hours, Rasulullah’s SA physical jism mubarak was weak and frail. Yet despite this condition and severe illness, upon hearing someone leading namaaz in his mehraab, with the assistance of Amirul Mumineen SA, he headed to the masjid and pulled that individual out from the qiblah. Rasulullah SA would not allow that man to lead a single namaaz; how could Khuzaima accuse Rasulullah’s SA Dai RA of allowing others of exploiting his Dawat and appointing someone as his successor without his raza and blessings?