Table of Contents
| Reason # 1 Mazoon in the Role of Mumineen’s Mother
|
Dai al-Hayy al-Muqaddas, Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA, often said, “Mumineen mein tamara bawa choo ane maa bhi choo.” Hence Moula RA always assumed both roles. |
| Reason # 2 The Matter of Private Nass Without Witnesses
|
Nass has always been performed in front of witnesses. Khuzaima deliberately misinterprets the bayaan his own father, Syedna Taher Saifuddin Aqa RA for his nefarious intentions and conveniently omits other authentic bayan which contradict his falsehood. |
| Reason # 3: How can “The Second in Command” Go Against The Dawat?
|
Many dushmano were former holders of maratib. Even a previous Mazoon, just like this former Mazoon, Khuzaima. |
| Reason # 4 The Credence Of The Witnesses Of Aqa Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddas’s Nass Mubarak
|
Khuzaima cannot even begin to try and sow doubt on Nasse Jali when he wasn’t even a witness. Syedna al-Qadi al-Noman RA states so. |
| Reason #5 Analysis of Nass Video on Khuzaima Qutbuddin’s Website
|
Exhaustive analysis of the Nasse Jali video posted on fatelidawo, which defeats the futile allegations of Khuzaima. |
| Reason #6 Khuzaima Qutbuddins absence during the Janaza Namaz and final rites | Syedna Taher Saifuddin Aqa RA has clearly stated that only a Dai’s Mansoos will lead the Dai’s Janaza namaz and conduct dafan. |
| Reason # 7: Why Would Khuzaima Be In The Rutba of Izn For Fifty Years And Have Never Been Removed?
|
Examples of how in the entire history of Dawat , many people of Rutba have been kept in their rutbas despite their huge insufficiencies in I’lm, Amal, Walayat, Ta’at amongst others. And that this is done for many reasons known to Saheb of the Zaman. |
| Reason # 8: Echoes of Past Fitnats in Our Zaman
|
The children of Khuzaima have done Iqraar of nass before, now him and they do Inkaar, like many a Dushman before him. |
| Reason # 9 – Al-Jami‘ Al-Anwar
|
“From the day al-Jami’ al-Anwar was built barakaat has flourished in Da’wat.” – Dai al-Hayy al-Muqaddas, Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA“I, Mamluk aale Mohammed am saying that – he (Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS) did the khidmat of these Jawami‘, may Allah make his effort appreciated!” – Dai al-Hayy al-Muqaddas, Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA |
| Reason # 10 : Lack of Comprehension of Dawat Books & Discrediting others | This entry revisits the deliberate misinterpretation of Dawat Kitaabo by Khuzaima to further his agenda. It also shows his deliberate disregard to five known instances of Nass on Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. |
| Reason # 11: “Jamea maari zaat che”
|
Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA has repeatedly stated that “Jamea maari zaat che“. Khuzaima shared an explicit disdain to Al Jamea tus Saifiyah as an institution, which according to Aqa Moula al-Muqaddas, was his own Zaat Mubaraka. |
| Reason # 12 – The Inherent Contradictions In Khuzaimas Reference to Syedna Hatim’s RA Zikr
|
Khuzaima himself disproves his own statement while inadvertently demonstrating his complete disregard for the shaan and maqaam of the Al Dai Al Mutlaq. |
| Reason #13: Humility Vs Self Centeredness
|
Khuzaima claims to be of angelic virtue. However, his apparent self-centeredness denies him any such virtue. |
| Reason # 14: Khuzaima as the Son of Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
|
Khuzaima is the son of the Syedna Taher Saifuddin Aqa RA but brazenly disobeyed Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. That biological kinship becomes meaningless as Khuzaima disobeyed both Dai’s and continues to disobey Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. |
| Reason #15: Nass-e-Jali 1432H, A rendering in English
|
This entry links to English renderings of the Nass Misal Sharif sent to Mumineen by Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA during the Shere Ramazan of 1432H. |
| Reason #16: Syedi Mukasir Saheb; An Example To Follow
|
Khuzaima exalts the position of Mazoon and Mukasir, however, he disregards the actions of Syedi Mukasir Saheb DM in regards to Nass. |
| Reason #17: Analysis of Syedi Aminji b Jalal Text Regarding Nass e Khafi with reference to Nabi Idris AS
|
Further refutation of the fundamental premise of the claim of Khuzaima on fatelidawo that Nass can occur in private without witnesses. |
| Reason #18: Black & White
|
A Mumin Mukhlis seeing everything clearly. |
| Reason #19: The Maqaam of Dai al-Asr – (Part One)
|
An analyzation of Khuzaima’s claim that Dai al Zaman Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA was unaware of what was going on. |
| Reason #20: The Maqaam of Dai al-Asr – (Part Two)
|
Continuing look into Khuzaima’s false claim that Dai al Zaman Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA was unaware of what was going on. |
| Reason #21: Hypocrisy Personified
|
Khuzaima hypocritically claims the Nass Misal Shareef to be a fraud, while making a spectacle of receiving a benedictions’ email from the same Wazarat that sends the Nass Misal Shareef. |
| Reason #22: Ph.D in Dawat ni Dushmani
|
Abdeali, the son of Khuzaima, openly states in his dissertation submitted in 2003 that Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin’s RA perception and implementation of Fatemi fiqh (jurisprudence) is distorted. Khuzaima has supported these ideas in the vision of his new Da’wat. |
| Reason # 23: The Letter – And The Notion Of Official Addresses And Titles In Coherence With The Traditions of Da’wat (Part 1)
|
Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS addressed Khuzaima with respect and humility in an old letter with respect to his Murtaba (at that time). This is a sign of Aali Qadr Moula’s TUS true humility. |
| Reason #24: The Letter – And The Notion Of Official Addresses And Titles In Coherence With The Traditions of Da’wat (Part 2)
|
In His letter to Khuzaima, Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS’s accorded the same titles in addressing Khuzaima Qutbuddin that are awarded to a Mazoon; titles that are not the same as the titles used for a Da’i Zaman. |
| Reason #25: Premise & Conclusion “Khuzaima ni Dua Mustajaab che”
|
Justifying nass on Khuzaima based on this premise is a fallacy. There are numerous references of various types and peoples Dua being ‘mustajaab’, for instance a beggar’s du’a. Can the same conclusion be derived in that case? |
| Reason #26: The So called ‘Amanat’ of Nass | According to Khuzaima’s fatelidawo website, Syedna Burhanuddin Moula RA’s wishes were to keep his nass private, and reveal it ‘after His sad demise’. Khuzaima revealed this alleged “secret” well before, proving his khiyanat, not amaanat in the matter…. though there never was such an amaanat to safeguard. |
| Reason #27: Rebuttal on Mazoon’s “Absolute Truthfulness”
|
Khuzaima’s claim of absolute truthfulness is questionable to say the least. Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA’s explains in a bayan regarding the 1409H incident in Africa that Khuzaima was misled by munafeqeen and failed to discern between right and wrong. |
| Reason #28: Qasm by Quran | There is no record of a Dai having to swear by the Quran to prove that he was the rightful Dai, for every Dai is the sura of the Quran. On the contrary Mu’awiyah resorted to raising the Quran in the battle of Siffeen. |
| # 29: Regarding the Photograph With Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA. | Khuzaima interprets a sharaf of having a photo taken with Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA and Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA as an indication of Nass. The post contains a collection of photos of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS alongside His naas Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. |
| Reason #30: Where is the Quality? | For the leader of either a majority or a minority, the standing of his companions, the quality of his supporters, is a reflection upon himself. This post compares the qualities, fazl and shaan of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddins TUS hudud fozala and Khuzaima’s band of lackeys. |
| Reason #31: Misaaq is to Moula, not to Mazoon | The misaaq is an oath of allegiance to Haq na Sahib, the Da’i Zaman and Imam uz Zaman – not to Mazoon or Mukasir, which is clear from the misaaq text. |
| Reason #32: In your 50 years
|
This is an emotive piece that compares the blessings of His Eminence Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS on every mumin and the absence of Khuzaima in all walks of a mumins life. |
| Reason #33: Aqa Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddas RA Na Ishaara About Khuzeima Qutbuddin
|
It is the utmost important duty of any Da’i to do Nass on his successor, therefore rather than Khuzaima’s claims, we should more trust in the words of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. It is clear that Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA’s words throughout the last fifty years do not reflect Khuzaima and his children’s claims. |
| Reason #34: Doubt Cannot Undermine Conviction | This post examines in detail the nass on Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS documented in Miyasaheb Ibrahim Yamani’s diary; one of many different, both explicit and implicit, in which Syedna Burhanuddin RA made it clear beyond doubt, that his mansoos and successor was al-Dai al-Ajal Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. |
| Reason # 35: The Perspective Of A Lawyer | A lawyer argues from a legal perspective, how Khuzaima could never fulfill the requirements imposed on a trustee, citing an incident in San Jose where Khuzaima performed anew the ta’sees rasm of the masjid after Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA had already performed it earlier in London. |
| Reason # 36: The Illustrious Histories of Past Mazoons AQ In Da‘wat – True Paragons of True Khidmat | This post reviews the true fazl and ikhlaas of past Mazoons in Dawat history, in particular Syedi Shaikh Adam Safiuddin AQ, who although being the eldest son of Syedna Abdul Tayyeb Zakiuddin RA served both his younger brothers with unquestionable ikhlaas when they became Dai Zaman. |
| Reason # 37: 15 Years Ago…. | A testimony by a Farigh Jamea Talabat in Dallas, whose family had prepared for Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA’s utara, but were honored by having Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS’s utara instead. Maulana RA’s consoled the family by likeneing Mufaddal Moula TUS’s utara to his own, a Dai’s utara. |
| Reason # 38: Syedna Burhanuddin RA as our Bawa Shafeeq: Lessons to his children | This post analyzes the question: What sort of father and Bawa Shafeeq does Khuzaima think Syedna Burhnauddin was? Because he has hardly ever quoted or pointed to any teaching of Burhanuddin Moula RA. Furthermore, as Bawa Shafeeq how could Moula RA fail to teach His Shehzadas the core tenets of nass? |
| Reason #39: Ali b Ibrahim was the Ex-Mazoon of Syedna Abduttayyib Zakiuddin
|
A refutation to Khuzaima’s audacious claim that “No Mazoon in 900 years of Dawat al-Satr history has ever gone against the wishes of the Dai”, by proving that Ali Bin Ibrahim WAS instated by Syedna Abdul Tayyeb Zakiuddin RA as Mazoon. |
| Reason #40: The Lack of Understanding | Bazat Tahera, in her publication on Syedna Moayyad Shirazi’s poetry, clearly challenges Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA’s interpretation of one of Syedna Moayyad’s bayts (verses), whereas whatever Moula says or does, is unquestionably and unequivocally Haqq |
| Reason #41: Regarding The Mutation Of The Misaaq And Deviation From Haqq
|
Unlike the Qur’an which might not be translated or modified, Do’at Mutlaqeen have overseen variations in the Misaaq text since it was first institutionalized. After Nass e Jali it is incumbent that the name of the Mansoos be inserted after the name of Dai Zaman, because the misaaq is for both Naas and his Mansoos. |
| Reason # 42: Where was the Hero And Champion In This Critical Time? | Syedna Badrul Jamali RA braved all odds when summoned by Imam Mustansir SA, to rescue Cairo and restore control in the city. Where was Khuzaima when he saw that the Da’i and Da’wat were being allegedly ‘hijacked’ and mumineen were purportedly being led astray. |
| Reason #43: Miyasaheb Shk Ibrahim Yamani’s Madeh | A semantic analysis of one of Miyasaheb Ibrahim Yamani’s madeh’s in praise of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS pointing out inferences to his nass. |
| Reason #44: Flawed Conclusion- A Lawyer’s perspective | A lawyer’s response to ex-Chief Justice Ahmadi’s belief in Khuzaima’s claim – summarized in three points. 1) The phrase “hear the alternative party too”; a basic principle of justice. 2) Testimony of eyewitnesses to Syedna Mufaddal TUS’s nass. 3) Documentary evidence proving Maulana Mufaddal TUS’s nass. |
| Reason #45: Enemies Bear Witness | Historical evidence is presented to show even past enemies of Dawat, regardless of what attacks they leveled against nass being conferred, knew that nass could never take place without witnesses. |
| Reason # 46: Of Titles And Entitlement – ‘Al-Walad al-Ahab’ | When nass is conferred, they may embellish the stature of the mansoos, as they would of any person receiving them. However, on their own they are not evidence of nass, as Khuzaima would care to think. A critical analysis of the honorific al-Walad al-Ahabb. |
| Reason #47: Witnesses Deriving Benefit
|
The testimony of a witness to his own benefit is unlawful according Shariat and contemporary law. How does Khuzaima think his testimony alone as witness to his own nass can be accepted? |
| Reason # 48: Khuzaima’s Press Release
|
Khuzaima’s through his futile press and video releases, try to claim moral high ground, and berate Mumineen’s actions. There is no conspiracy or orchestration behind this natural reaction towards someone who has slandered their Moula Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS by accusing him of unthinkable sins just after the heart wrenching demise of Syedna Moahmmed Burhanudin RA. |
| Reason #49: Lost In Translation | Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA has mentioned many of his other children in Rasail, not just Khuzaima as he would like others to believe. One may take from those writings that other brothers are in fact mentioned with higher honors than Khuzaima. |
| Reason # 50: The Principles of a Fatemi Heritage
|
Khuzaima’s announced “visions” and “policies” directly contradict the Fatemi Heritage that Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin’s RA and all Awliya AS struggled to establish. |
| Reason # 51: Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA and the Title “Aali Qadr Mufaddal”
|
Honorifics and titles bestowed to Khuzaima are not unique to him. Any claimed “Ishaara” and “meanings” by him are meaningless without Nass. Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS however was honored with the title “Aali Qadr” by Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA himself, and has had Nass appointed upon him, hence the revealing the deeper meaning of the title “Aali Qadr”. |
| Reason # 52: The Nass Mubarak of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin al-Hayy al-Muqaddas RA
|
An audio clip of the Mansoos of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA, Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS reading the letter detailing the first known instance of Nass upon him, while simultaneously showing the actual letter, which is signed by Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. Proof just doesn’t get more conclusive than this. |
| Reason # 53: We Hear Your Call
|
Hurr, through free will and reasoned choice heard the call of Husain AS and became the first to achieve martyrdom in Kerbala. We heard the call of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA and chose it. Today we hear his call through his Mansoos and Waris, Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS, and consciously and certainly choose to say “Labbaik, Labbaik!” |
|
The following continuing reasons identify the gaping holes and flaws of Husain Qutbuddin’s Q&A sessions.
|
|
| Reason # 54: Like Father, Like Son
|
Like the Fatelidawo website, Husain Qutbuddin in his two some hours of banter, chooses repetitive arguments and logical fallacies that lead to no logical conclusion while obscuring of the main issue that his father Khuzaima, has had NO NASS performed on him. |
| Reason # 55: A Call To Reason – The Undeniability of Nass | Husain Qutbuddin needs to follow his own advice and use intellect and reasoning. There are almost a dozen points he should contemplate with intellect and reason, as one who defies logic and reason is delusional. |
| Reason # 56: Do Dawat texts not confirm?
|
Dawat texts only confirm and support the Nusoos (pl. Nass) upon Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. Khuzaima attempts to manipulate texts to gain legitimacy are futile. |
| Reason #57: Rhetoric Is Not Substance
|
Husain Qutbuddin’s replaces substance in his “Q&A sessions” with rhetoric, unreferenced anecdotes, subjective interpretation and blatant lies. |
| Reason # 58: Husain Qutbuddin’s Intellect: To See or not to See
|
Husain Qutbuddin provides limited options and flaws in premise to enforce upon his listeners the arguments he wishes to make. Their lack of merit unravels upon actual scrutiny. |
| #59: No Comparison
|
Husain Qutbuddin futilely attempts to make Haqq about who has the smallest group of people supporting him. Haqq is Haqq. Haqq is Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. |
| #60: In Khuzaima We (dis)Trust
|
Husain Qutbuddin takes improper liberties with the meaning of the Martaba “Mazoon”, and claims infallibility. Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA made it clear in the Kalemaat Nooraniya we all heard, that Khuzaima is definitely not infallible. |
| # 61: The Essence of al-Jamea-tus-Saifiyah
|
Husain Qutbuddin while trying to justify his whole family’s distance from both the institution of Al Jamea tus Saifiyah and hence the Moula whose Zaat is Al-Jamea, he inadvertently but clearly expresses his hidden disdain and hatred. |
| Reason #62: His Own Dawat
|
Khuzaima in reality, declared his own “dawat” (not towards haqq!) far before the Wafat of Muqaddas Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. True Dawat towards haqq was the Dawat of Syenda Mohammed Burhanuddin RA and now True Dawat towards haqq is the Dawat of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS. |
53 Reasons NOT To Believe Khuzaima Qutbuddin 
No matter what he was mazoom for 50 years syedna taher saifuddin ‘s shezada he should be addressed with respect .Again fatemi dawat is addressed deliberately I am not jumpy on any side hoe you belittle your kirdar by being disrespectful .
Dear Mona,
I am in awe of your hypocrisy. You demand respect for Sayedna Taher Saifuddin’s RA shezada, but want none for your undisputed 52nd Dai Sayedna Mohammed Burhanuddin’s RA shezada? You tell the writers to respect Khuzaima, whom they have not disrespected in any way except by removing the mazoon’s title from in front of his name (as he is not mazoon anymore, by either accounts), and otherwise just stating historical facts, while Khuzaima publicly curses our Moula TUS? And above all, he curses in response to a warm, heartfelt invitation from our Moula TUS to rejoin dawat. I find it so amusing when people say, “how can you say something about Sayedna Taher Saifuddin’s RA shehzada” – don’t they realize that they are saying the same about, not ONE, but ALL of the shehzadas of the 52nd Dai that they claim to love?
Oh, and I completely believe that you are ‘not on any side’, but just choose to blindly follow and passionately (but not quite so logically or politely) defend a certain side over the other. Who are you trying to fool? Go ahead and declare yourself a follower of Khuzaima – aren’t you proud to be one? Or are you embarrassed?
To the writers of this blog – I am sorry I cannot be as polite and civil as you in replying to this poster. I am human, and as is human nature, blatant hypocrisy disgusts me.
~ A proud follower of Sayedna Muffadal Saifuddin TUS
So was iblees among malaikats before Allah Subhanhu asked him to prostrate for Maulana Adam(AS) . He refused and hence became the recipient of lanat.
@Mona,
Couple of points –
1. Mazoon title KQ himself removed by declaring himself something which he is not and will be not.
2. If you read the reasons mentioned here properly, you would have read about Nooh’s Son example mentioned in Quran.
Please read this site with open mind and hopefully you will recognize the falsehood of KQ claim.
Abde Syedna Mufaddal Moula (TUS)
Khuzema
Thank you so very much for not stopping at reason#53. When the 53rd reason was posted, some of us were genuinely sad and messaged each other telling how upset we were that there would be no more of this very enlightening source of dawat knowledge.
I am looking forward to many more of your highly intellectual posts. Not a day goes by where I may not have visited your blog. And you’re doing such a great job at this that I find your work being forwarded around on whatsapp. And each time I receive one of those, I proudly tell the sender that it is taken from your blog that I religiously visit, because it helps strengthen my faith in my religion, and so they should do the same.
I feel immense satisfaction whenever I get to promote your blog amongst mumineen mukhleseen.
Keep up the good work
Jazakallah khair
Amate SYEDNA Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS (and proud!)
Unbelievable!!
If the dawedaar was to be believed, then all what Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA fought for in all the courts battles would prove worthless..
Just think mona ji.. If someone in future challenges your self proclaimed leader in the courts.. like what has happened before.. How would he answer to that??
How can people not see what is in black and white and believe what is practically non-existent.
Just think again mona ji.. What would prevent someone in your so called dawat to act like what your self proclaimed leader is acting now?? Who would you believe if all of his sons picks up the Quran and swears and sings their own praises??
It has been a proven legacy of all the Dai’s through clear cut evidence and witnesses which someone is challenging.
Think…. Think… Think!!!!!! How can you not??????
On the very first day I recd the shameful msg from Mr. K. I wrote to Ali Qader Mola TUS confirming our (mine & my wife’s) Misaq with humble request to give me Raza to reply to Mr. K. in his own language but WITHIN 4 DAYS I recd Farman asking me to remain quiet. Since then I have been very closely following your msgs which are excellent. May Allah with the Doa Mubarak of our Mola give you strength & ability to cope. We are all with you & Mola.
Abde Syedna – Shk. Hamza Mu. Dawoodbhai MDH – Colombo
it is of great solace to read these articles and know that not a single one of the falsehood and lies spread around, remain unanswered. we really keep looking forward to more of these. shukriya.