Reason #30: Where is the Quality?

Having a majority is not in itself proof of Haqq. There is no disputing this position. However, for the leader of either a majority or a minority, the standing of his companions, the quality of his supporters, is a reflection upon himself. It could be said that, in part, the merit of your associates is comment on your own character and vision.

Hudaat Kiraam RA have always been surrounded by their noble disciples and followers, even if they were few in number.  History has noted that though Ameerul Muminen Moulana Ali SA had few devoted supporters of his cause after the demise of Rasoolullah SA, they were publicly known to be of righteous character and elevated status. They had served Rasoolullah SA with diligence and sacrifice, especially in the early battles of Islam. This is especially apparent in the time of Ameerul Mumineen’s khilafat when he received the support of most muhajereen and badreyeen (those who fought in the battle of Badr). On the other hand, his opponent from Banu Omaaya was surrounded by a contingent of Rasoolullah’s pardoned prisoners of war, the remainder of his opponent s from the battle of Ahzaab (Khandaq) and mercenaries. This very observation was made by Aqeel bin Moulana Abi Talib SA and annoyed the Omayyad no small measure when he visited his court in Syria.

“Aqeel laughed aloud in his court. When questioned about why he burst out laughing, Aqeel replied that when I witness the majlis of Ali, I see him surrounded by Muhajereen and Ansaar. Whereas I see this court filled only by freed prisoners of war and the remnants of Rasoolullah’s opponents”

Over the course of Dawat in Satr, each Dai Mutlaq has been endowed by, at the least, a few notablehudood kiraam (dignitaries of Dawat). They served their Dai and Mumineen with distinction and excelled in the acquisition and dissemination of Ilm Aale Mohammed SA. Following their example, individuals in different strata of Mumineen also performed exemplary service.

There has been a vast spectrum of learned hudood over the course of the last half century. Who amongst them has supported Khuzaima in his claim? Yes, Haqq is not ascertained by numbers but one cannot help but question that who amongst the learned in all the various institutions of Dawat has acknowledged his leadership. It seems strange that ALL such learned men and women knowingly submitted to or supported Baatil according to Khuzaima’s claims. Who are his notable dignitaries of standing? The majlisof Dai al-Zaman Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS bears witness to Hudood Kiraam, Qasr Aali, Bayte Zainee, Kothar Mubarak, Asateza, Ummaal, Moallemeeen, Mazaaraat Khidmat guzars, talabat of Jamea and learned and perceptive Mumineen Mukhliseen. According to Khuzaima, they all have failed in identifying Haqq. In discrediting all these groups, he is claiming that the efforts of Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA and Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA were wasted. They tirelessly cultivated these Dawat resources even though all of them would eventually follow the path of falsehood? Repeated testimonies from the Imami takht regarding their khidmat amount to nothing? Today, not even one Dawat khidmat guzar is named in his retinue. Even those that were gradually left him one by one. I wonder why this so.

Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddins majlis where Dawat Hudood from Syedi Mukasir Saheb are seated; those who have directly seeked ilm e aale Mohammed from Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA and Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA.

Syedna Mufaddals majlis

Syedna Mufaddals majlis

Khuzaimas majlis “hudood” comprises of 3 of his own children, whom didn’t have the good fortune to be born in Syedna Taher Saifuddins RA era, nor had the tawfeeq to attend Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddins RA waaz regularly, nor attended Al Jamea tus Saifiyah.

KQs Majlis

Khuzaimas Saqeefah

Yes, one is definitely left perplexed. If quantity is not a measure of Haqq, what of quality?

Advertisements

3 comments

  • M Mustafa Shk Shabbir Saifee

    Sanctity and dignity of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin tus is as well established and comprehended as ineligibility and unworthiness of Khuzaima Qutbuddin.
    My point is not to prove him wrong intellectually, spiritually or mentally but it is pure PHYSICAL. As we all know that khuzaima qutbuddin has been affected by an ailment which has snatched his clarity of speech and pronunciations of words long back. Each and every word said by him is hardly audible and understandable. This single quality is a setback for him to proclaim himself the rutba of dai mutlaq.
    Imam ahmed al mastoor AS has clearly mentioned few qualities which should be acquired by any individual to be fit for being a rasool (messenger). Messenger in ordinary sense is a person who has been sent by someone to convey the message properly and clearly. Our prophet Mohammed SA was himself known as RASULULLAH SA (messenger of allah ta). When a normal messenger should possess a certain amount of quality to befit this post, the messenger of Imam ul zaman as, His Dai Mutlaq should acquire these qualities.
    Imam Ahmed al Mastur as has listed 16 qualities which should be possessed by a messenger. Out of these I would like to mention the third, fourth and fifth quality which are related to the messengers orating qualities. Imam states these qualities that a messenger should be:
    1) Eloquence of speech
    2) Rhetoric language
    3) Best pronouncement
    These qualities, as we all know are absent in Khuzaima Qutbuddin. So physically he cannot be fit for the divine position he claims.

  • M Shabbir Turab bhai

    This reason focuses rightly on the quality of the companions and followers of syedna mufaddal saifuddin tus. Here i would like to add an inference derived from established facts.

    Muddai falsely claims righteousness on the virtue of “minority”. He believes his companions being less in number qualify his mission as truthful and credible just as the adherence of few followers of maulana ali AS was an indication of righteous path.

    This comparison is like admiring a picture from a few feet without closely examining its details, which would give the onlooker a better and fair assessment. You cannot buy a commodity merely on its looks without studying the utility details, can you?

    What i found on close examination of this surfaced comparison that those who pledged adherence to maulana ali AS were the very same persons who maintained close proximity with rasulullah SA. In fact those who were the most active in rasulullah’s khidmat were quickly seen clustering with maulana ali AS soon after rasulullah’s wafat. Even during His hayat mubaraka they were never seen distancing themselves from His wasi. Likewise we see those elite persons who were always seen by syedna muqaddas’ side pledging their support and allegiance to syedna saifiddin TUS immediately after His wafat.

    On the contrary, those who were not even in a mile’s vicinity of syedna muqaddas during his hayat suddenly started portraying themselves as office bearers and competent guides of an alleged parallel dawat that has nothing to offer except distorted principles and limping doctrines!

    How can the companionship of those be considered symbol of credibility eldest of whom was born years after syedna muqaddas had documented his nas on syedna mufaddal whereas many companions of syedna mufaddal have the privilege of accompanying syedna taher saifuddin RS as well. Surely the claim “few followers signify haq” is far fetched and therefore critically crippled!

  • M Mustafa Sk Burhanuddin Taskeen

    This reason focuses rightly on the quality of the companions and followers of syedna mufaddal saifuddin tus. Here i would like to add an inference derived from established facts.

    Muddai falsely claims righteousness on the virtue of “minority”. He believes his companions being less in number qualify his mission as truthful and credible just as the adherence of few followers of maulana ali AS was an indication of righteous path.

    This comparison is like admiring a picture from a few feet without closely examining its details, which would give the onlooker a better and fair assessment. You cannot buy a commodity merely on its looks without studying the utility details, can you?

    What i found on close examination of this surfaced comparison that those who pledged adherence to maulana ali AS were the very same persons who maintained close proximity with rasulullah SA. In fact those who were the most active in rasulullah’s khidmat were quickly seen clustering with maulana ali AS soon after rasulullah’s wafat. Even during His hayat mubaraka they were never seen distancing themselves from His wasi. Likewise we see those elite persons who were always seen by syedna muqaddas’ side pledging their support and allegiance to syedna saifiddin TUS immediately after His wafat.

    On the contrary, those who were not even in a mile’s vicinity of syedna muqaddas during his hayat suddenly started portraying themselves as office bearers and competent guides of an alleged parallel dawat that has nothing to offer except distorted principles and limping doctrines!

    How can the companionship of those be considered symbol of credibility eldest of whom was born years after syedna muqaddas had documented his nas on syedna mufaddal whereas many companions of syedna mufaddal have the privilege of accompanying syedna taher saifuddin RS as well. Surely the claim “few followers signify haq” is far fetched and therefore critically crippled!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s