Reason #33: Aqa Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddas RA Na Ishaara About Khuzeima Qutbuddin

Khuzeima Qutbuddin and his children claim that:

“Aqamola RA performed Nass on him 50 years ago, in private, when he appointed him Mazoon on 17 Shaban 1385H, saying: “Maara pachhi bhai Dai chho,” and he instructed him not to reveal the nass until the appropriate time. “

Furthermore, they suggest,

“Syedna Khuzaima Qutbuddin was Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin’s Mazoon until his wafat. No one can dispute this. Mazoon’s aala shaan is attested in Dawat kitaabo. Therefore, you must accept that what Syedi Mazoon Saheb is saying about Nass is the truth (and that what shehzadas are claiming counter to that is fabricated).” (please also note that this text says Syedi Mazoon Saheb in it as of Feburary 1st 2014. This site was published on January 17th hours after Aqa Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddas’s demise yet the authors are still calling Khuzeima ‘Syedi Mazoon Saheb.’ This is just more proof that this website preparation preceded Aqa Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddas’s RA passing and seems to have been compiled in anticipation of his demise. What Mumin would prepare such a site and make such claims unless they were preparing for the demise of Moula RA. This is not only heart-wrenching it is outright detestable).

However, more than the words of a Mazoon claiming that they are the next Da’i, on the contrary, it is more prudent and sound to rely on the words of Dai al-Satr himself. In fact, it is the utmost important duty of any Da’i to do Nass on his successor. For this fact everyone is in agreement. So if Khuzeima Qutbuddin and his children claim that we should believe him because he was the undisputed Mazoon for 50 years – shouldn’t we put more trust in the words of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin al-Hayy al-Muqaddas RA? Wouldn’t Aqa Moula TUS had given us an ishaara of some kind? Wouldn’t he have wanted to somehow ensure that mumineen follow his true successor? In fact,  traditionally throughout Da’wat’s history  Duaat Mutlaqeen RA have employed Nass Jali (open and public proclamation of Nass) along with Nass Khafi (hidden or nass done in private) in order to ensure that the Mansus was known to the majority. This is simple common sense. However, the meaning of Nass Khafi (hidden nass) does not just mean that it is done in private; rather, it also extends to ishaaras (gestures) that are given by the Da’i towards the shaan of his successor. These types of ishaaras, Nass Khafi, were conducted on Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS countless times and Mumineen are witness to them, not just in the last three years, but throughout the history of Aqa Moula Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin al-Hayy al-Muqaddas’s zaman. We have discussed some on this site, such as Reason # 9, and we will discuss more in other entries. However, if the claimants, Khuzeima Qutbuddin and his children, suggest that he  (KQ) is the true successor of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA – than surely it is only logical that Aqa Moula RA gave some sort of ishaara towards this and their claims.  

However, it is clearly  evident that the ishaaras from bayaan mubaraks of Aqa Moula Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin al-Hayy al-Muqaddas RA do not resonate with Khuzeima Qutbuddin and his children’s claims and that is why they have refrained using even one example from the Iqtebasaat Nuraniyya (excerpts from Ashara Mubaraka – the main event and congregation of Mumineen in the zamaan of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA) in their entire website as a source for anything, much less for Nass Khafi or ishaara towards Khuzeima Qutbuddin’s stature. It would make complete logical sense that in these gatherings, in which the largest flock of Mumineen Mukhliseen who gathered each year in growing numbers, Aqa Moula Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin al-Hayy al-Muqaddas RA would have done some sort of ishaara about Khuzeima Qutbuddin if he was his true successor. Well, Aqa Moula RA did one ishaara in the bayan below. In Dubai Ashara 1425 H., referring to the tartīb in the zaman of the 41st Dai, Syedna Abdul Tayyeb Zakiuddin RA (see Reason # 23 below) Aqa Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddas RA said,

al-Maula al-Ajal Shaikh Adam Safiyuddin was the eldest of them all. He was the Shehzada of Syedna AbdulTayyib Zakiuddin RA. He, this Shaikh Adam, was in the rutba of Mazoon – a very eminent (baland) Rutba. However, that every single Mazoon becomes a Da’i, that is not the case. He (Syedna Abde Ali Saifuddin RA) is the Dai al-Satr. 

Satr’s Dai has immense responsibility and must carry a heavy burden, one that no one is able to carry except with the power and might of Khuda (خدا ني حول انے قوة سي).

Therefore, Aqa Moula Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin al-Hayy al-Muqaddas  RA first taught us not to compare the maqam of Da’i Satr with that of the Mazoon and secondly, Mazoon is not always the next Da’i. Although, their rutba is very ‘aala, it does not outrank that of the successor who is going to become Da’i. This was his clear ishaara towards us – العاقل تكفيه الاشارة – ‘a meaningful gesture is enough for an intellectual.’

The website of Khuzeima Qutbuddin, fatemidavat.com, does just the opposite. It is solely a claim of his less than humdrum fifty years of service as the Mazoon as proof of his successorship. Rather than believing his cherry-picked arguments – I would rather put my faith in the words of Aqa Moula Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA – who is still speaking to us today. Therefore, the appendage – al-Hayy al-Muqaddas – echoes even more clearly in our ears.

Advertisements

3 comments

  • Shk. Prof. Hussain

    KQ claims that syedns taher saifuddin maula RA has given aayat 53 of surah Nahl as
    ishara of nass on him, as follows
    “The verse clearly indicating what Syedna foresaw for his eldest son who was at that
    time not yet openly nominated as successor. The ‘alaamat given to Syedna Qutbuddin was ‘wa ma bikum min ni’matin fa minAllah’ (whatever ni’mat or grace you have, it is from God – Surat al-Nahl, Aya 53).”

    But when we read the whole verse in holy quran, it states that
    “And ye have no good thing but is from Allah: and moreover when ye are touched by distress unto Him ye cry with groans”(translation by Yousuf ali).
    Thus this verse clearly indicates that syedna taher saifuddin maula has given a ishara that syedna mohammed burahuddin RA will gift rutba of mazoon to KQ for 50 years and, afterwards when Syedna mufaddal saifuddin (TUS) will be designated as 53rd dai by him, this misfortune or DISTRESS will not be tolerated by KQ and he will CRY WITH GROANS.

    Abde Syedna(TUS)
    Shk. Prof. Hussain

    • M Mustafa Sk Burhanuddin Taskeen

      Sk Prof Husain bhai …. very nice deduction! I was thinking since long how to counter this point. Shukran jazilan.

  • I’d like to share one incident with me in the Shehrullah of 1434H..

    I visited the bungalow of the erstwhile Mazoon in Thane for evening prayers and was shocked at the announcement by Abdul Gawi (Abdeli) of our times of this fitnat…

    After the ziafat by Arsiwala’s they gathered around one of the sons of KQ (Abdeli)

    They tried to sing praise of Mazoon and his educated family and said that Kothar and general public have stopped respecting him. The Sabaq given wrong doctrine amongst public and Dawat text are being misinterpreted…All these were serious allegation///

    Then..Abdeli responded ‘I know about it all and WE SHALL RAISE OUR VOICE AT AN APPROPRIATE TIME…The bayan done by ‘their’ Amils around the world is the reason why my father is looked down by AAM Janta…

    I was shell shocked by these words coming from someone from Qasre Aali and high stature….almost like a reformist…I cried in my heart…what are the times are we living when Syedna Burhanuddin RA’s own family talks like a munafiq….

    Are they on HAQ or my tasawwur after attending a decade of Ala Haqaiq Sabaq true???….

    For next two days I was very disturbed..and it was Shehrullah..I was beseeching the Almighty to show me Haq…

    how can the Haq ni Dawat be ‘hijacked’ by evil forces as claimed by Abdul gawi?…

    how come raza na saheb preach wrong doctrine amongst mumineen..wouldn’t Syedna correct it through divine intervention?

    Is the Zahir -Batin theory of Mazoon clan correct?

    Is rutba na saheb being abused and sidelined?

    Suddenly, I stumbled upon the pages of Iqtebaasat Nooraniyah of 1415H…the papers were almost 20 years old and yet not faded..I had shifted 4 houses and all through the years..these pages have traveled with me..NOTHING BUT DIVINE INTERVENTION and DESIGN

    Lo and behold..what did I read??

    Al Hayyul Muqaddas Syedna Mohammad Burhanuddin RA coming to the rescue of my soul….the bayan of 2 full pages talking about the RUTBAs after Dai’s Satr…explaining to me…that indeed what I have learnt in Asbaaq is true …..

    it’s nothing but Mo’jiza of my beloved Moula (RA) directly saving me from falling into their trap…I cannot openly discuss the tasawwur since I am under oath not to disclose Dawat Asraar (learnings in Ala sabaq)

    I was relieved and overjoyed after reading the BURHAN of our beloved Al Hayyul Muqaddas Syedna Mohammad Burhanuddin RA .

    May his TRUE SUCCESSOR Syedna Aali Qadr live till Day of Qiyamat in good health & prosperity.Ameen

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s