Reason # 56: Do Dawat texts not confirm..
(In reply to Husain Qutbuddin’s Youtube video)
Husain Qutbuddin further alleges that everything he says, his father’s claims, it is all supported by Dawat texts. In his farfetched attempts to give his cause legitimacy through our kitaabs, he forgets that all the instances of nass upon Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS, in actuality are verified and supported by the history of previous nusoos (pl. nass) found in the texts of Dawat.
Let us evaluate.
Do Dawat texts not confirm that previous Dais, such as Syedna Abdeali Saifuddin RA (43rd Dai) and Syedna Mohammed Ezzuddin RA (23rd Dai), have had written documents drafted in which they indicate their nass upon their successors and then have attested such documents in their own hand?
Do Dawat texts not confirm that previous Doat Mutlaqeen RA, such as Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA (49th Dai), have had brothers of the mansoos and other close relatives bear witness to the nass? Have they not entrusted such people with the responsibility of testifying to the validity of nass?
Do Dawat texts not confirm that nass is complete only with tawqeef, the act of identifying and describing the mansoos to someone other than the mansoos himself?
Do Dawat texts not confirm that previous Doat Mutlaqeen RA have always had witnesses bear testimony to the nass, regardless of whether it was private or public?
Both reason and Dawat texts support the conclusive nass done upon Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS by Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. Khuzaima’s claims neither hold up to reason nor have any validity in these texts.
It seems, then, that Husain Qutbuddin, despite receiving a PhD in Quran Majeed from Cambridge University, and his father and his siblings are the ones who lack reason. Husain said that those who abandon resaon, pointing at the nearly 1 million followers of Moulana Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS, are equivalent to animals for abandoning their intellect and ´aql. I just cannot see it that way.