Reason #87: Why KQ Never Recites “Fulkul Hussain”
In the first waaz during Ashara 1431 H, Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA stated that in following in the footsteps of his esteemed father, “Mamlook e Ale Mohammed has composed this marthiyah (Fulkul Husain), [which I presented] in the khidmat of Imam Hussain during the historic trip to Karbala (1430 H)”.
The following year, during 1432 H Ashara Mubaraka, he referred to the marthiyah he had composed and stated that “….in perpetuating this unbroken line of bukaa’, Mamlook-e-Aale Mohammed did araz in this marthiyah that…..”
The zikr of Imam Hussain AS and especially this marthiyah shareefah, encapsulates the one of the greatest legacies of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA – his deep-rooted love for Imam Hussain AS and the nurturing of that love in the hearts of Mumineen.
Khuzaima’s Complete Disregard for this Marthiyah
Yet, this marthiyah, which represents what Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin stood for and all that Imam Hussain meant to him, has been disregarded and dismissed by Khuzaima and his followers.
Not once, in a single bayaan or waaz, not even during the Asharas he conducted after 1430 H did he recite a single verse from this marthiyah – not one. In fact, he and his sons stopped Mumineen from reciting it. If they wanted nothing to do with it, then at least they could have let those who loved their Moula recite Moula’s marthiyah. But they did not.
Past and Present
Khuzaima clings on to the past, not realising that the past only holds meaning when it is understood through the present. He will recite (just as he has done in his most recent video) Ya Syeda al- Shohadaa’, but never Fulkul Hussain. He recites the marthiyah of his father but never the one of Burhanuddin Moula, who called him ‘Al-Walad al-Ahabb’ (most beloved son) three times. Is this how he shows his reverence to his spiritual father?
Due Reverence
Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin’s every action, gesture and sentence was revered by every mumin. Khuzaima enjoys drawing parallels between himself and the great Mazoon, Syedi Abdulqadir Hakimuddin QR. However, does he know what Syedi Hakimuddin would do when receiving any correspondence from the Dai of his time? He would be waiting in earnest, anticipating the arrival of a letter or mithaal. When the letter would arrive, he would stand up in reverence, would kiss the seal of the Dai and lay the handwritten words of the Dai upon his forehead. Did he not take heed from the seerat of the eminent mazoons of the past? Taher Qutbuddin reminds us that Khuzaima would do sajda when Syedna Burhanuddin’s RA mithaal would reach him. Why is he respecting Maula’s mithaal mubarak but disrespecting his marthiyah mubarakah?
It seems unfathomable why Khuzaima adamantly refuses to recite this marthiyah. Why is it so difficult for him?
· Is it because he thinks it is below his stature to recite the marthiyah of the 52nd Dai Mutlaq?
That would mean he sees himself above and beyond the position of Dai Mutlaq.
· Is it because he believes that the marthiyah is a misrepresentation of Imam Hussain, the events of Karbala and the meaning of bukaa’ and matam?
· Is he saying that he knows better how to do the zikr of Imam Hussain AS, that somehow he is better versed and better equipped for the rithaa’ of Imam Hussain?
If so, then it is a direct assault on the lofty and exalted status of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. He thinks himself superior to the Dai of his time. He is denying that the Dai is the recipient of the faiz of Panjatan, Aimmat and Duat and says and does things which have no basis in fact.
It is worth keeping in mind that Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA composed this marthiyah two years before his stroke, which Khuzaima claims incapacitated Moula. The reality is that even if Moula did not have a stroke and he conferred nass in such a state, it would have made no difference to Khuzaima. He would have still come up with baseless claims that he was mansoos. His rejection of this marthiyah is evidence enough that he rejected everything that Moula said and did.
In the end one can only conclude that given all the facts, Khuzaima’s omission of this marthiyah from all his discourses and gatherings since 1430 H, is further evidence of his deep contempt for Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin. Ultimately in doing so, he has denied that Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin was the rightful recipient of the nass of Duat Mutlaqeen.
‘Fulkul Hussain’ Personified
For forty days after Syedna Burhanuddin’s RA passing, this marthiyah mubarakah was recited in Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin’s TUS presence: at the side of Maula’s qabr mubarak, in sadaqallah and then during the majlis. Every single day. He knows that the single greatest eulogy to his father is the recitation of this marthiyah. It is proof of his deep-seated reverence, unflinching loyalty and uncompromising love for Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin – something only a mansoos can have.
53 Reasons NOT To Believe Khuzaima Qutbuddin 
Abkika Molayal Husain is the crowning jewel of Fatemi eulogy. As many like bhai Ali Asgar stated in recent comment that they are deriving a lot of Ilm from the site, I am sharing my tassavurat http://www.slideshare.net/asgarubi/abkika-booklet-hadiyah?utm_source=slideshow&utm_medium=ssemail&utm_campaign=post_upload
Example of how Khuzema and his minions manipulate facts:
Khuzema would say maney kidhu chey, “Your cat is pretty”
Infact haq na saheb ye farmayu hoy, “Your cat is pretty ugly”
He would eat away the last word. This is just one example of how Khuzema and his underlings manipulate hadeeth, kalaam and dawat na kitaab.
Most of the stuff on their site is a play on semantics and linguistic jugglery.
By the way, Khuzema, it’s amazing that your litter had to go to yahud and nasara half way across the globe to get their Phd thesis guided and approved. This simply proves that you never took enough pride in academic institution built by your forefathers, let alone your brother whom you claim to revere. You obviously never cared for Al Jamea Tus Saifiyah.
kq not reciting ‘Fulkul Husain’ marsiya sharifa, not being present in Dawat’s any important and historic miqaat with and in hadrat of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin Aqa,instead busy conspiring and preparing his own hadrat, not reciting madeh of Maulana Mohammed Burhanuddin Aqa (RA) instead continuously forcing his fickle minded staff to recitie his one and only baseless madeh, not to do zikr of the shannat and fadaail of Burhanuddin Maula in his boring & inarticulate vaaz instead boasting about his ownself again and again and the list goes on and on..
My friend told me that before 2-3 years kq was granted raza to do ashara in Godhra.When first time Burhanuddin Maula did karam and ehsaan and granted raza for worldwide live relay of yaume aashura maqtal vaaz where mumineen got first time the sharaf of deedar of two Dai al mutlaq, Naas and Mansoos (Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA and Syedna Aaliqadr Mufaddal Saifuddin aqa TUS) together sitted on one Imami takht like Syedna Taher Saifuddin and Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin on one single takht.. At that time kq didnt allowed the relay to be shown instead did his own bayaan.After than when Godhra Mumeneen mukhleseen came to know what they missed due to kq, they were crying and regretting.
Maula’s shaanat and fadaail cannot be counted as they are unlimited, similarly the list of kq for doing befarmani of Maula RA cannot be counted and is unlimited.
And they are so shameless, that this site breaks their each and every word and arguments efficiently with proof and evidence then too they will still write and launch videos in youtube making fun of their own self everytime.
kq and his kin thinks themselves educated and knows very well that mukhleseen mumineen will never ever leave their Maula Mufadaal TUS at any stage at any cost then why they are wasting their time & resources in such negative publicity activities? Even they know in their hearts that their followers are not actually followers but they are either those person who sold their ownselves for some bucks or are of their types only. Their followers lack the factor of ‘Mohabbat’.
Lastly we the proud followers of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin only say to kq and his kin that ‘hamne hamara Maula mubarak ane tamne tamari dawat’.
Khuzaima is a man of very low selfesteem. He did not want to recite because he was by faith no more wedded to Maulana Mohammed Burhanuddin R.A. On the contrary he had created an “Associate” of his own self which is shirk. For such people Al Quran says: Fa eza rakebu fil ‘fulke’ dawullaha mukhleseena lahuddin falamma najjahum bil barre ez hum yushrekoonleyakforu bema a’atynahum wa leyatamattaoo fasawfa ya’alamoon.
1430H Moulana Al-Hay-ul Muqaddas Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin (R.A). Ye Azeem Marsiyah Mubaraka Fulkul -Hussain Tasneef Farmaya ehna pachi 1431H ma Aa Dawedaar KQ Bangalore ma ashara ni waaz karwa aayo hato.. I was in Marol that time kem ke Moula(R.A) 1431H na Ashara waha aqd kida hata.. yeh ashara ma mara abba Bangalore maj aa dawedaar ni waaz ma jata hata ane mane kahyu ke aa KQ ye Pura ashara ma moula na aa Marsiya nathi parha ane na parhaya. Ehne yeh sharaf mile bhi kaha si? ye toh dushman che!! We are the priviledged nd proud followers of Moula(R.A) and Aaliqadar Moula(TUS) who have got this sharaf. May KQ be Forever be Mehroom of this Barakat.. When he came here his sons and clan-members used to say mumineens here to say Moula Moula when he raises his hand for no reason.. I remember telling some mumin bhai not to since he was juz a mazoon then nd our moula was one nd only Aqa Mohammed Burhanuddin(RA). This KQ and his Clan stayed here for about 70 days!!..I think the List of KQ treacheries is endless..
I also admire the khidmat done by the contributers to this Site.. May you get Afzal Jazaa for the great work you are doing by efficient and logical reasoning. May we Follow Haq with the haq na saheb ane hamara jaano na malik Aqa Moula Syedna Aaliqadar Mufaddal Saifuddin(TUS).
Abde Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin(TUS),
Taher.
another post from shk aziz bhai
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/azizpoonawalla/2014/03/dawoodi-bohra-women-speak-about-home-science/