Reason #65: The So Called ‘Amanat’ of Nass (Part TWO)

Continued from Reason #26: The So called ‘Amanat’ of Nass

As they days go by, the evidence to refute this point keeps increasing. Hence, I have decided to make a sequel to this point.

  • In the video posted in the DaweDaarNiKaha series, Sh Mansoor Yamani, who spent many years in the service of Khuzaima Qutbuddin clearly testifies that Bazat Tahera Qutbuddin was told about this ‘so called Nass’, more so, she even brainwashed her children to believe he was the 53rd Dai.

IF the Nass was a strict Amanat from Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA to Khuzaima Qutbuddin, then why did he divulge this information to his children, and allow it to be passed on to his grandchildren? What makes them so special to be privy to this information and not other mumineen? He claims this was to kept secret until Burhanuddin Moula’s demise. It seems he couldn’t keep it to himself and then let the cat out of the bag many years in advance. This is khiyanat (betrayal of trust) in the highest form.

  • It very well known that Khuzaima Qutbuddin, throughout his life equated himself to Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. He demanded the same protocol that was only for the Dai.

Sh Mohammed Yamani testified to this fact that in Colombo he stopped mumineen from going to Burhanuddin Moulas hazrat, claiming that since he was present, it was one in the same, and it was not necessary to travel elsewhere. In another video posted in the DaweDaarNiKahaani series, these Sahebs testify this fact.

IF Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA had in fact done Nass on Khuzaima Qutbuddin, and instructed him to keep it private, why then was he parading amoungst Mumineen pretending to be the Dai himself, or his Mansoos. Since he was instructed to keep the Nass private, he should have been more humble, subtle and extra cautious as to not let anyone be aware of this fact.

These few points are evidence that Khuzaima Qutbuddin did not uphold the Amanat of the ‘so called Nass’. He did khiyanat (betrayed this trust).

How can one who cannot hold steadfast the Amanat of Nass be entrusted and capable of holding the Amanat of the Dawat and the position of Dai Muthlaq?

UPDATED 23 MARCH 2014

(A thought sent via Email)
One point I picked up while scrutinising HQ’s videos myself, was that he mentions he was present during 1434H Asharah Mubarakah in Surat. He mentions he was in ‘taqiyyat’. I thought the nass on his father was meant to be kept private and that KQ was not to tell anyone. So clearly HQ knew, hence he was in ‘taqiyyat’. He was concealing his belief that, his father was mansoos. This goes against the whole foundation of their claim.
This is proof that Khuzaima Qutbuddin didn’t carry out the Amanat of Nass as allegedly instructed to him by Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin, he revealed this to his children and his cronies (as clarified above as well).

6 comments

  • Farida M Mustafa Shakir

    Someone very rightly commented that when the Nass conferred upon by Aqa Moula( RA) is being denied by Khuzaima and his children then it stands to question for all the times when people who came to him and asked raza for various things and which were answered by his sons. People took the answers deeming that the sons spoke thru the father as what khuzaima spoke was totally indelible . So how can they even think of pinpointing to Dr Moizbhaisaheb when he conveyed what Moula had said.

  • Davedaar’s son himself acknowlwdges the Nass done on Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin ( TUS ) in one of his video clip. I am not sure that has been published on this website. If its not done, kindly let me know how can I share with you.

  • Wht does taqiyyat?

  • Mohammed Mulla Saifuddin Rangoonwala

    This sher of Ghalib suits this KQ and his ilk very much: Iman mujhenkhinchey hai tau rakey hai mujhe kufr, Ka’aba merey peechey hai Kalisha meryey aagey. Further he says : Masjid ke zairey saya ek ghar bana liya hai , Ye banda’e kamina ham saya e khuda hai.

  • Mohammed Mulla Saifuddin Rangoonwala

    Amanat means to reserve . When you reserve something, it means you need to deliver . If you reserve something physically , for somebody , you can deliver to him physically. If you reserve it unto your soul you need to be true to yourself when the time comes to offload it. If you don’t , you will be reckoned as the usurper. And Al Quran does not like this as it says “Innahu La yohibbul khaenin” . Allah does not love the usurper.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s