As they days go by, the evidence to refute this point keeps increasing. Hence, I have decided to make a sequel to this point.
In the video posted in the DaweDaarNiKaha series, Sh Mansoor Yamani, who spent many years in the service of Khuzaima Qutbuddin clearly testifies that Bazat Tahera Qutbuddin was told about this ‘so called Nass’, more so, she even brainwashed her children to believe he was the 53rd Dai.
IF the Nass was a strict Amanat from Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA to Khuzaima Qutbuddin, then why did he divulge this information to his children, and allow it to be passed on to his grandchildren? What makes them so special to be privy to this information and not other mumineen? He claims this was to kept secret until Burhanuddin Moula’s demise. It seems he couldn’t keep it to himself and then let the cat out of the bag many years in advance. This is khiyanat (betrayal of trust) in the highest form.
It very well known that Khuzaima Qutbuddin, throughout his life equated himself to Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. He demanded the same protocol that was only for the Dai.
Sh Mohammed Yamani testified to this fact that in Colombo he stopped mumineen from going to Burhanuddin Moulas hazrat, claiming that since he was present, it was one in the same, and it was not necessary to travel elsewhere. In another video posted in the DaweDaarNiKahaani series, these Sahebs testify this fact.
IF Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA had in fact done Nass on Khuzaima Qutbuddin, and instructed him to keep it private, why then was he parading amoungst Mumineen pretending to be the Dai himself, or his Mansoos. Since he was instructed to keep the Nass private, he should have been more humble, subtle and extra cautious as to not let anyone be aware of this fact.
These few points are evidence that Khuzaima Qutbuddin did not uphold the Amanat of the ‘so called Nass’. He did khiyanat (betrayed this trust).
How can one who cannot hold steadfast the Amanat of Nass be entrusted and capable of holding the Amanat of the Dawat and the position of Dai Muthlaq?
UPDATED 23 MARCH 2014
(A thought sent via Email)
One point I picked up while scrutinising HQ’s videos myself, was that he mentions he was present during 1434H Asharah Mubarakah in Surat. He mentions he was in ‘taqiyyat’. I thought the nass on his father was meant to be kept private and that KQ was not to tell anyone. So clearly HQ knew, hence he was in ‘taqiyyat’. He was concealing his belief that, his father was mansoos. This goes against the whole foundation of their claim.
This is proof that Khuzaima Qutbuddin didn’t carry out the Amanat of Nass as allegedly instructed to him by Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin, he revealed this to his children and his cronies (as clarified above as well).
53 Reasons NOT To Believe Khuzaima Qutbuddin 